Parvin Asadpour; Reza Yousefi Saeedabadi; Vahid Fallah
Volume 12, Special Issue , June 2018, , Pages 1869-884
Abstract
The purpose of the research is to identify and rank the components of perfectionism in the education managers of Mazandaran province. This research is purposeful and effective in terms of descriptive method of field research. The statistical population consists of 2,653 people, directors, heads of departments ...
Read More
The purpose of the research is to identify and rank the components of perfectionism in the education managers of Mazandaran province. This research is purposeful and effective in terms of descriptive method of field research. The statistical population consists of 2,653 people, directors, heads of departments and departments of education departments and directors and deputies of schools in Mazandaran province. Based on the Cochran formula, 338 people were selected by cluster random sampling method Selected as samples. To collect data, a researcher-made perfectionism questionnaire with 60 questions in two dimensions and nine components was used. The face and content validity of the tool was confirmed by the experts and its reliability was calculated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.78. For analyzing the data, exploratory factor analysis was used. The results showed that among the dimensions of perfectionism, the progressive dimension with the factor load of 955 had the most effect and the deterrent dimension with factor load of 926.0 had the least effect. Also in the dimension of perfectionism, the component of "desire to order" has the greatest impact and the component of "trying to be excellent" has the least effect. In the dimension of deterrent perfectionism, the component of "concern for mistakes" has the most and the least component of "rumination" has the least effect.
